click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20121129
20121207
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> pink slime? abc news is upset about that. for your safety this energy drink. this big drink and raw milk are illegal. >> why do you want to drink raw milk? >> because i want to. >> if you can't pick your own food are you free? >> basic food freedom should be like freedom to worship, speak or own a gum. gun. >> does that mean i could eat her or him or him. >> oh good. >> that is our show tonight. >> john stossel. >> food can kill. people who eat the wrong stuff may get sick. that's why most everyone says we need the government to set limits make sure there's no bacteria in your food or dangerous chemicals to make sure food companies tell you what is in the food and how fattening it is. felix ortiz has done that in new york city. he got calorie counts posted at mcdonald and other fast food places. now he wants a ban on adding too much salt. so representative ortiz you think you have saved lives because of these things? >> absolutely. >> joe is a farmer he grows vegetables also raises cows, chickens and pigs. i assume you want the people who buy your beef and pork to be safe. don't we
the governor. >> they have their own tax policies energy costs, property taxes which is a local issue as opposed to the state issue that they have to account for. if we can stop competition, we should do it. but, we don't have those things. it is not an even playing field. let me give you another example. my republican governor colleagues want to see medicaid blocked. almost all of my democratic colleagues don't want to see it done. most of the democrats represent state that is will not enter into a race to the bottom when it comes to medical benefits. connecticut is never going to act as one legislature did in a state to deny a kidney transplant to somebody whose life will be saved by it. if you block grant it, you have a bunch of states that are not going to do this or this. there are states that are trapped. they wouldn't tolerate putting someone to death over a bad kidney. this is a serious argument. we can all talk about how we compare ourselves. understand, underlying all of that is we are not comparable. >> i actually think you are making a really, you are giving me a great ope
it has happened since october 4th. retailers drove the consumer discretionary sector energy industrials lead in the wake, and the rally started just minutes before house speaker made it clear that republicans are willing to deal on revenue and ready to find a resolution now. >> we all know that we have had this spending crisis coming at us like a freight train. it must be dealt with. and in order to try to come to an agreement, republicans are willing to put revenue on the table, but it is time for the president and democrats to get serious about the spending problem that our country has. i am optimistic that we can continue to work together to avert this crisis sooner rather than later. lou: meanwhile, the president to a short time later claimed he is doing his part to make certain the middle class is not hit with tax increases. >> i want to reassure the american people and doing our part, sitting down with ceos, sitting down with labour leaders, talking to leaders in congress. i am ready and able and willing and excited to go ahead and did this issue resolved in a bipartisan fashion.
. cheryl: is time to make money with charles payne, looking at texas-based energy company. charles: it is the topic of the day because the department of energy came out with a gigantic study on liquefied natural gas and for the most part after reading all of it the upshot is it is a great thing for america's economy. at the forefront of this, they got approval to export liquefied natural gas a year ago. the day they got the approval i contacted the company and a secretary said we can't talk to anybody, we're all partying. the stock, subscribers have been in this three four times, this is capital intensive. they have $11 billion and raised -- putting this on and start to export this by 2015. chris that given the dim view on gasoline and zynga wire investors' optimistic this will allow president obama to turn positive? charles: if the president will see the numbers he likes like manufacturing the only edge we have a, this is why this is so amazing. natural gas costs $16.58 in japan. is less than $3 here and $12 in europe so we will have a competitive advantage to be able to put some
2 emissions problem? what would you recommend? >> well, fundamentally, as long as green energy is much more expensive than fossil fuels you're never going to convince, certainly not china and india, but not even the u.s. and europeans, that you need to innovate the price down and that's the solutions pretty much every place. >> we haven't got the technology. >> and you expect that? >> absolutely, so the point is stop putting up inefficient solar panels now. but make sure you get them to be cheap enough everyone will want them in decades. >> your judge is that a carbon tax may reduce co 2 emissions a little tiny put if you do it in america, but won't help the overall problem. now i want you to tell me, do you think that a carbon tax is coming to america? >> well, there's certainly a lot of good arguments why you'd want one. it brings in a the lot of money, but the real problem of course, brings in lots and lots of political controversy so you're actually taking your eye off the ball of fixing the problem in the sense that-- >> let's have your judgment. it brings with it politica
to focus on is the reality that 85% of our energy in this country is fossil fuel based. megyn: if you look at the latest polls, it was may of 2011, a portion of americans who believe change will affect them a great deal or moderate amount is up 42%. that is up. they believe that this will hurt you two generations. the american public seems to be with him on climate change and emissions and the need to regulate them. does not empower him to do more on this issue? >> i don't think so. what empowers him is the will of the people that has been expressed to the congress and the senate of the united states. but this president is doing something that is really unprecedented. not entirely. fdr did some of this. this president is taking the rule by fiat to a whole new level. he is circumventing congress rather than working with congress. he is frankly creating a way to pursue his political ends that don't involve reaching national consensus. but don't involve reaching an agreement or securing an expression of the rule of the people. his mandate is for him to do whatever he wants. >> the other side
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7 (some duplicates have been removed)